🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities will be slashed by more than half, following a divisive legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple elected officials based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to create a Māori ward by initially putting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and urging their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, saying local residents should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – six of the seven cities required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to establish other types of electoral districts – such as rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that voted to keep their wards.