🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system frequently! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots added after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, young, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year went for Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I wish he does because then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I think there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. So there was a little resistance. But overall, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see more of that – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.